tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5682535467434223800.post508721861140850289..comments2023-11-08T22:36:17.793-05:00Comments on SirRobert's World: Check mate...Roberthttp://www.blogger.com/profile/05255878533958017256noreply@blogger.comBlogger7125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5682535467434223800.post-31440617302157632932008-04-28T12:14:00.000-05:002008-04-28T12:14:00.000-05:00Good to see you again b4d6uy...I'm glad you came b...Good to see you again b4d6uy...<BR/><BR/>I'm glad you came by to voice your feelings. :-)<BR/><BR/>I should also add that if someone were to find evidence that was indicative some sort of intelligent Design I would be very interested in seeing it!<BR/><BR/>To date though it ID seems only interested in 'poking holes' in Darwin's theory and our modern understanding of it... which really isn't a bad thing because it shows where the weaknesses are. But that's still a negative enterprise. Where's the positive effort to support ID?<BR/><BR/>RobertRoberthttps://www.blogger.com/profile/05255878533958017256noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5682535467434223800.post-14130976433615487442008-04-28T09:49:00.000-05:002008-04-28T09:49:00.000-05:00hoverfrog...leap...I get it.I think it’s interesti...hoverfrog...leap...I get it.<BR/><BR/>I think it’s interesting that the whole argument between ID/Creationism and Evolution exists in the first place - since they are (scientific or not) mutually exclusive. Why isn’t the Creationist argument leveled against Abiogenesis?<BR/><BR/>Seems kind of silly to me - but what are you gonna do?<BR/><BR/>Personally, I believe science should continue to figure out how things work, especially for the purpose of solving global issues that impact mankind. I would like to think that scientists are open to all possible outcomes - that if there is someday some “proof” of a Creator, that they will see the data and make the acknowledgment. It’s only supernatural if it’s not understood; if it is figured out someday how a Creator created then it would be within the limits of our understanding, and therefore natural.<BR/><BR/>"I'd never contribute to such a dishonest enterprise." - Interesting ... I wonder if you shop at WalMart? Or pay taxes?<BR/><BR/>It's pretty hard to not contribute to some dishonest enterprise somewhere along the line.b4d6uyhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/07018679794052572593noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5682535467434223800.post-56375383823865736232008-04-28T07:52:00.000-05:002008-04-28T07:52:00.000-05:00Welcome back HoverFrog!!I myself did not pay...It'...Welcome back HoverFrog!!<BR/><BR/>I myself did not pay...<BR/><BR/>It's a good thing to have friends who work in a cinema :D<BR/><BR/>R.Roberthttps://www.blogger.com/profile/05255878533958017256noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5682535467434223800.post-91224562493521829792008-04-28T07:45:00.000-05:002008-04-28T07:45:00.000-05:00Badguy, allow me to leap in to the conversation an...Badguy, allow me to leap in to the conversation and point out that intelligent design is not a theory. Not in the scientific sense that evolution is a theory. ID proposes nothing and tests nothing. <BR/><BR/>It should not be taught in schools at all, let alone in science classes. The idea of exposing children to such a ridiculous windbag of theidiocy is insulting and should not be entertained except in a philosophy class as an example of where honest enquiry can go wrong when it is hijacked by people with agendas.<BR/><BR/>[/rant]<BR/><BR/>I'm also planning on watching this piece of work (insert other four letter word of your choice) but I'm not paying for it. I'd never contribute to such a dishonest enterprise.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5682535467434223800.post-57443798326189903052008-04-24T21:00:00.000-05:002008-04-24T21:00:00.000-05:00Hi b4d6uy Thanks for stopping by. :)In answer to ...Hi b4d6uy <BR/><BR/>Thanks for stopping by. :)<BR/><BR/>In answer to your question;<BR/><BR/>I think Michael Moore is a reactionary wind bag! He is just as bad as the producers of this film but from the opposite side of the political spectrum.<BR/><BR/>R.Roberthttps://www.blogger.com/profile/05255878533958017256noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5682535467434223800.post-37873061089960458872008-04-24T16:42:00.000-05:002008-04-24T16:42:00.000-05:00btw - b4d6uy is b4dguy - but even more people have...btw - b4d6uy is b4dguy - but even more people have stolen the badguy moniker and it's many permutations on blogspot than on wordpress.<BR/><BR/>Jeff's the name; badguy is the nickname/handle.b4d6uyhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/07018679794052572593noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5682535467434223800.post-46703048231958444552008-04-24T16:41:00.000-05:002008-04-24T16:41:00.000-05:00Thought I'd pop over to you blog spot and check up...Thought I'd pop over to you blog spot and check up on you.<BR/><BR/>How is it you can spell duplicitous, disingenuous, and legerdemain here, and not complete a simple sentence over there? (I know - spellcheck!) <BR/><BR/>Anyway, I thought the point of this film was not to debunk Darwin's theory, but to explore why/how it came to be that "only" this theory is acceptable to be taught in schools and not other theories such as "intelligent design"?<BR/><BR/>(I'm going to see the movie tomorrow, so no spoilers please!)<BR/><BR/>How do you compare a Ben Stein documentary to a Michael Moore documentary? Are they even in the same ballpark? Just curious.b4d6uyhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/07018679794052572593noreply@blogger.com